Reuse of exchange in AQE does not happen when run time filters are pushed down to the underlying Scan ( like iceberg )

In certain types of queries for eg TPCDS Query 14b, the reuse of exchange does not happen in AQE , resulting in perf degradation.
The spark TPCDS tests are unable to catch the problem, because the InMemoryScan used for testing do not implement the equals & hashCode correctly , in the sense , that they do take into account the pushed down run time filters.

In concrete Scan implementations, for eg iceberg's SparkBatchQueryScan , the equality check , apart from other things, also involves Runtime Filters pushed ( which is correct).

In spark the issue is this:
For a given stage being materialized, just before materialization starts, the run time filters are confined to the BatchScanExec level.
Only when the actual RDD corresponding to the BatchScanExec, is being evaluated, do the runtime filters get pushed to the underlying Scan.

Now if a new stage is created and it checks in the stageCache using its canonicalized plan to see if a stage can be reused, it fails to find the r-usable stage even if the stage exists, because the canonicalized spark plan present in the stage cache, has now the run time filters pushed to the Scan , so the incoming canonicalized spark plan does not match the key as their underlying scans differ . that is incoming spark plan's scan does not have runtime filters , while the canonicalized spark plan present as key in the stage cache has the scan with runtime filters pushed.

The fix as I have worked is to provide, two methods in the SupportsRuntimeV2Filtering interface ,
default boolean equalToIgnoreRuntimeFilters(Scan other)

{ return this.equals(other); }

default int hashCodeIgnoreRuntimeFilters()

{ return this.hashCode(); }

In the BatchScanExec, if the scan implements SupportsRuntimeV2Filtering, then instead of batch.equals, it should call scan.equalToIgnoreRuntimeFilters

And the underlying Scan implementations should provide equality which excludes run time filters.

Similarly the hashCode of BatchScanExec, should use scan.hashCodeIgnoreRuntimeFilters instead of ( batch.hashCode).

Will be creating a PR with bug test for review.