Uploaded image for project: 'Solr'
  1. Solr
  2. SOLR-11244 Query DSL for Solr
  3. SOLR-17101

CoveringQuery support via {!bool should=only should=only ... mm=clausesReqField}

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Sub-task
    • Status: Open
    • Minor
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

    Description

      Lucene Sandbox has a pretty cool CoveringQuery. We might support it right here in {!bool} via :

      1. allowing to specify a field name right in mm param
      2. in this case, limit occurs to should only clauses (simplification just for the beginning).
        However, piggyback on {!bool} might not be a good idea, and covering query deserves own QParserPlugin
        WDYT?

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              Unassigned Unassigned
              mkhl Mikhail Khludnev
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated: