Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Resolved
-
Minor
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
Description
Reported by a friend –
<dataConfig> ... <field column="Address" xpath="/records/fullrecord_metadata/addresses/address_name/address_spec/full_address" /> <field column="AddressALL" xpath="/records/fullrecord_metadata/addresses flatten="true" /> ... </dataConfig>
This definition doesn't seem to be importing anything in Address field – everything is consumed by AddressALL.
I looked briefly at the implementation of XPathRecordReader and it seems it's greedy with respect to flattened tree nodes, assuming no other field extracts data from subnodes.
I think this is a bug (or is it by design)?
Attachments
Attachments
Issue Links
- is superceded by
-
SOLR-14783 Remove DIH from 9.0
- Closed