Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Open
-
Major
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
0.13.0, 0.13.1, 0.14.0, 1.0.0, 1.1.0
-
None
Description
Logically and functionally bucketing and partitioning are quite similar - both provide mechanism to segregate and separate the table's data based on its content. Thanks to that significant further optimisations like [partition] PRUNING or [bucket] MAP JOIN are possible.
The difference seems to be imposed by design where the PARTITIONing is open/explicit while BUCKETing is discrete/implicit.
Partitioning seems to be very common if not a standard feature in all current RDBMS while BUCKETING seems to be HIVE specific only.
In a way BUCKETING could be also called by "hashing" or simply "IMPLICIT PARTITIONING".
Regardless of the fact that these two are recognised as two separate features available in Hive there should be nothing to prevent leveraging same existing query/join optimisations across the two.
PARTITION MAPJOIN
Use the same type of optimization as in BUCKETED MAP JOIN for PARTITIONED tables.
The partition map join could be performed if the tables being joined are partitioned on the join columns.
If table A has set partitioning on KEY column and table B is partitioned on KEY column, the following join
SELECT /*+ MAPJOIN(b) */ a.key, a.value
FROM a JOIN b ON a.key = b.key
can be done on the mapper only. Instead of fetching B completely for each mapper of A, only the required partitions are fetched. For the query above, the mapper processing partition key='20151208' for A will only fetch partition for key='20151208' of B.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is a clone of
-
HIVE-9523 For partitioned tables same optimizations should be available as for bucketed tables and vice versa: ①[Sort Merge] PARTITION Map join and ②BUCKET pruning
- Open