Uploaded image for project: 'HBase'
  1. HBase
  2. HBASE-4755

HBase based block placement in DFS

Log workAgile BoardRank to TopRank to BottomAttach filesAttach ScreenshotBulk Copy AttachmentsBulk Move AttachmentsVotersWatch issueWatchersCreate sub-taskMoveLinkCloneLabelsUpdate Comment AuthorReplace String in CommentUpdate Comment VisibilityDelete Comments
    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • New Feature
    • Status: Closed
    • Critical
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • 0.94.0
    • None
    • None
    • None

    Description

      The feature as is only useful for HBase clusters that care about data locality on regionservers, but this feature can also enable a lot of nice features down the road.

      The basic idea is as follows: instead of letting HDFS determine where to replicate data (r=3) by place blocks on various regions, it is better to let HBase do so by providing hints to HDFS through the DFS client. That way instead of replicating data at a blocks level, we can replicate data at a per-region level (each region owned by a promary, a secondary and a tertiary regionserver). This is better for 2 things:

      • Can make region failover faster on clusters which benefit from data affinity
      • On large clusters with random block placement policy, this helps reduce the probability of data loss

      The algo is as follows:

      • Each region in META will have 3 columns which are the preferred regionservers for that region (primary, secondary and tertiary)
      • Preferred assignment can be controlled by a config knob
      • Upon cluster start, HMaster will enter a mapping from each region to 3 regionservers (random hash, could use current locality, etc)
      • The load balancer would assign out regions preferring region assignments to primary over secondary over tertiary over any other node
      • Periodically (say weekly, configurable) the HMaster would run a locality checked and make sure the map it has for region to regionservers is optimal.

      Down the road, this can be enhanced to control region placement in the following cases:

      • Mixed hardware SKU where some regionservers can hold fewer regions
      • Load balancing across tables where we dont want multiple regions of a table to get assigned to the same regionservers
      • Multi-tenancy, where we can restrict the assignment of the regions of some table to a subset of regionservers, so an abusive app cannot take down the whole HBase cluster.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

        Activity

          This comment will be Viewable by All Users Viewable by All Users
          Cancel

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned Assign to me
            karthik.ranga Karthik Ranganathan
            Votes:
            1 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            48 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Slack

                Issue deployment