Uploaded image for project: 'Solr'
  1. Solr
  2. SOLR-12582

Consider api/documentation synergies/overlap between JSON Faceting relatedness() function and significantTerms sreaming expression

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

    Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Open
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      In SOLR-12581, Alexandre asked the tangential question below, which i've spun off into it's own jira...

      Sort of a side-question, but this work [adding new options to the JSON faceting relatedness() aggregation] seems to overlap/compliment the significantTerms work done for streaming/QueryParser: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_4/stream-source-reference.html#significantterms

      Are we saying SignificantTerms is for simpler use cases (as fore/back queries are corpus-wide) and then go into relatedness() for more complex analysis?

      Should the options be roughly compatible where it makes sense and/or similarly named?

      Just wondering because I could see this confusing newbies trying to see when to use which option.

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              hossman Chris M. Hostetter
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated: